Name Wins Draws Losses Games Score
Alex 6 0 0 6 6.0
Monique 3 1 2 6 3.5
Andre 3 1 2 6 3.5
Ben 3 0 3 6 3.0
Cassie 2 0 4 6 2.0
Pete 1 2 3 6 2.0
Niko 0 2 4 6 1.0
Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total
1.Alex XXX 1.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 6.0/6
2.Monique 0.0/1 XXX 0.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 0.5/1 3.5/6
3.Andre 0.0/1 1.0/1 XXX 0.0/1 1.0/1 0.5/1 1.0/1 3.5/6
4.Ben 0.0/1 0.0/1 1.0/1 XXX 0.0/1 1.0/1 1.0/1 3.0/6
5.Cassie 0.0/1 0.0/1 0.0/1 1.0/1 XXX 0.0/1 1.0/1 2.0/6
6.Pete 0.0/1 0.0/1 0.5/1 0.0/1 1.0/1 XXX 0.5/1 2.0/6
7.Niko 0.0/1 0.5/1 0.0/1 0.0/1 0.0/1 0.5/1 XXX 1.0/6
Monique vs Alex -- White is Checkmated
Ben vs Cassie -- White is Checkmated
Niko vs Pete -- Draw by Agreement
Cassie vs Niko -- Black is Checkmated
Alex vs Ben -- Black is Checkmated
Andre vs Monique -- Black is Checkmated
Ben vs Andre -- Black is Checkmated
Niko vs Alex -- White is Checkmated
Pete vs Cassie -- Black is Checkmated
Alex vs Pete -- Black is Checkmated
Andre vs Niko -- Black is Checkmated
Monique vs Ben -- Black is Checkmated
Niko vs Monique -- Draw by Agreement
Pete vs Andre -- Draw by Agreement
Cassie vs Alex -- White is Checkmated
Andre vs Cassie -- Black is Checkmated
Monique vs Pete -- Black is Checkmated
Ben vs Niko -- Black is Checkmated
Pete vs Ben -- White is Checkmated
Cassie vs Monique -- White is Checkmated
Alex vs Andre -- Black is Checkmated
Translate this page:
Translate this page:
Translate this page
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Erro's Scene #1 (Me)
Note: I don't have my notes with me, so I'm writing down the game events from memory.
Scene setup:
We have a Conflict:
Scene setup:
- Me: Erro is sitting in his Kinta office. As is usual, he is in a meeting with one of his subordinates, discussing the particulars of a routine case. Erro is no longer directly involved in investigations, or in dirty dealings. He carries that out through his subordinates, in a mutually beneficial way: He gets recognition for having a stellar team that gets thing done. His subordinates learn the ins and outs of his way of conducting business, and they get the benefits and favor from a high ranking official such as him.
- M2: (Investigate)(Intrigues): After Erro's meeting, his assistant informs him that a young investigator named Dygojikan has left a message requesting a meeting. It regards one of the more recent cases which his protégé, Rupko, had worked on. He has requested that Erro get back to him.
- Me: Erro instructs his assistant to convey how busy his office is, and to direct the young investigator to the case files on record. Erro knows that they are in order, and it's very unlikely anyone will find anything untowards in them.
- M2:(Spy)(Love): Erro's assistant says that the investigator has a witness in Rupko's lover, who was sent as a spy.
We have a Conflict:
- Me: If Erro wins, everything in the case files is found to conform to the rules, and no evidence of wrongdoing is found for this case. The only thing the investigator would have is the word of the spy, which is not enough to charge anyone with a crime. This is an act of conformity.
- M2: (??)(Inside) If M2 wins, someone close to Erro agrees to gather evidence and inform on him. This is an act of love for justice.
- Me: Failed roll
- M2: Succeeded roll
- Interpretation: Rupko was not thoroughly careful and left enough evidence of case tampering which the spy found. As a result, Rupko will be charged, which at the very least will make Erro look bad. The young investigator, Dygojikan, also convinced someone close to Erro to find evidence of Erro's corruption.
Monday, April 19, 2010
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Sercet's Scene #1 (M1)
To begin, I will let Mythic Player 1 (M1) "describe" what Sercet, his young scientist-priest is doing. The scene should be static.
Escalate: The bureocrat is adamant that the system makes no mistake. The argument becomes more contentious.
M2 gets to say what happens if this escalated roll fails:
M2: 4d4: 2, 3, 4, 1
M1 fails.
M2: (Extravagance)(Legal Matters): If M2 (antagonist bureocrat) wins, Sercet's mentor, the retired scientist-priest, is charged with heresy and arrested. This is an act of conformity.
1d10: 4
M1: 1d4: 3
M2 fails.
Sercet loses his temper and shoves the bureocrat. This prompts disciplinary action and his research project is shut down, and he is also suspended.
M1: (Take)(Love) Charges against the retired scientist are dismissed. Rumor has it that an influential friend had a hand in that decision.
M1: (Harm)(Environment)The scene thus set, now it's the Antagonist's turn to push the Protagonist.
Scene Interpretation: Sercet is, as usual, busy at his lab. This time he is selectively destroying cells in his neuron cell culture. His obession is to understand the process whereby the brain allows a person to be one with God.
M2: (Violate)(Bureocracy)This is our first Conflict. The stakes are as follows:
Scene Interpretation: Sercet's assistant interrupts him, to let him know of a bureocracy official who wishes to talk to him. Sercet receives the official and learns that the equipment logs indicate that proper procedure has not been followed in procuring lab equipment. This will be grounds for a fine and a suspension.
M1 succeeds with 10, but M2 has a 4 opposing roll. M1 roll now falls at 6, right on the fulcrum.
M1: (Block)(Plans): If Sercet wins, he produces proof that procedure was followed, and thus convinces the bureocrat that a system error must have ocurred during record keeping. He is using love of his research to convince the bureocrat.
2d10: 4, 10
M2: 4d4: 4, 2, 2, 3
Escalate: The bureocrat is adamant that the system makes no mistake. The argument becomes more contentious.
M2 gets to say what happens if this escalated roll fails:
- (Trick)(Anger) If M1 fails the roll, Sercet loses his temper and attacks the bureocrat. This will cause the permanent termination of his research.
M2: 4d4: 2, 3, 4, 1
M1 fails.
M2: (Extravagance)(Legal Matters): If M2 (antagonist bureocrat) wins, Sercet's mentor, the retired scientist-priest, is charged with heresy and arrested. This is an act of conformity.
1d10: 4
M1: 1d4: 3
M2 fails.
Me (audience roll):Interpretation of results:
- 1d4: 3 (will not use it)
Sercet loses his temper and shoves the bureocrat. This prompts disciplinary action and his research project is shut down, and he is also suspended.
M1: (Take)(Love) Charges against the retired scientist are dismissed. Rumor has it that an influential friend had a hand in that decision.
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Antagonist Outlines
Antagonists
M1's antagonist player: M2
Antagonist concept: (Triumph)(Liberty): Leader of a clique of scientist-rebels who want him to support their efforts to undermine the religion.
Antagonist Minutia:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity -4
Love vs Hate - 5
M2's antagonist player: Me
Antagonist concept: (Return) (Love): The orphan's parents, who have returned, professing that they never stopped loving the orphan, and were instead forced away for perceived sins.
Antagonist Minutia:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 7
Love vs Hate - 7
My antagonist player: M1
Antagonist concept: Rival within the Kinta, who wants to get Erro out of the way.
Antagonist Minutia:
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 6
Love vs Hate - 4
M1's antagonist player: M2
Antagonist concept: (Triumph)(Liberty): Leader of a clique of scientist-rebels who want him to support their efforts to undermine the religion.
Antagonist Minutia:
- (Develop)(Pain)
Comformity vs Non-Comformity -4
Love vs Hate - 5
M2's antagonist player: Me
Antagonist concept: (Return) (Love): The orphan's parents, who have returned, professing that they never stopped loving the orphan, and were instead forced away for perceived sins.
Antagonist Minutia:
- (Attach)(Ambush)
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 7
Love vs Hate - 7
My antagonist player: M1
Antagonist concept: Rival within the Kinta, who wants to get Erro out of the way.
Antagonist Minutia:
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 6
Love vs Hate - 4
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Praxis Scales
Praxis Scales represent the ways in which anything is done in this world. They will be used in Conflict.
Praxis Scales:
Praxis Scales:
- Comformity vs. Nonconformity
Altruism vs. Selfishness- Love vs. Hate
Monday, April 5, 2010
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Protagonists
Player: M1
Character concept: (Starting)(Intrigues): Younger, new scientist-priest, whose brilliant discoveries have begun to fascinate his colleagues.
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Sabotage
Name: Sercet
Features:
Story Goal: (Desert)(Emotions): Transcend all passions.
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 8
Love vs. Hate - 6
Player: M2
Character concept: (Take)(A Burden): Pious Kinta (Inquisition) member who considers it his obligation to protect the flock.
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Free Will
Name: Kaluvan
Features:
(Work Hard) (Good): The Kinta (Inquisition)
Story Goal: (Open)(Military): Put all of the ruling power directly into the hands of the Kinta (Inquisition).
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 3
Love vs. Hate - 4
Player: ME
Character concept: Higher level official of the Kinta, who has attained power by setting up and then busting those dealers he supplied with the illicit drug Lilik (Union).
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Greed
Name: Erro
Features:
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 4
Love vs. Hate - 5
=================================================================
Whew, it took me a while to come up with my character, in a way that made sense to me. I hope this habit of being so picky pays off.
As I was thinking about this character, I also began to worry that the Shock is not permeating the Issues directly enough. Or, more accurately, that the real Shock is not actually to be God For A Day, but the belief that Godhood can be attained through technology. Nonetheless, I've decided to leave things as they are, and chalk it off to experience if things don't work out as expected in this first game.
Note: I also used Bruce's suggestion to look at other languages, and derived the names loosely from foreign translations of their issues (Sabotage, Free Will and Greed).
On the next two posts, I hope to flesh out the Antagonists and decide on the Praxis scales.
Character concept: (Starting)(Intrigues): Younger, new scientist-priest, whose brilliant discoveries have begun to fascinate his colleagues.
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Sabotage
Name: Sercet
Features:
- (crisis)(restlesness): Edgy and impatient when faced with a dilemma.
- (doing)(persuasion): Persuasive in his arguments.
- (resolve)(learning): Tenacious in the search for knowledge.
- (Attach)(Intrigues): Rather fond of a retired scientist-priest with radical ideas.
- (Work Hard) (Magic): Obsessed with explaining the supernatural in terms of science.
Story Goal: (Desert)(Emotions): Transcend all passions.
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 8
Love vs. Hate - 6
Character concept: (Take)(A Burden): Pious Kinta (Inquisition) member who considers it his obligation to protect the flock.
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Free Will
Name: Kaluvan
Features:
- (Transform)(Balance): Believes that the only way to protect the flock is to change all balance of power to the Kinta (Inquisition).
- (Deceive)(Evil) : Will battle against the evil ones who deceive the flock.
- (Work Hard)(Good): Dedicates all his energy to the greater good.
Links:
(Neglect)(Misfortune): Deeply cares about an orphan abandoned and neglected by his sinful parents.
(Neglect)(Misfortune): Deeply cares about an orphan abandoned and neglected by his sinful parents.
(Work Hard) (Good): The Kinta (Inquisition)
Story Goal: (Open)(Military): Put all of the ruling power directly into the hands of the Kinta (Inquisition).
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 3
Love vs. Hate - 4
Player: ME
Character concept: Higher level official of the Kinta, who has attained power by setting up and then busting those dealers he supplied with the illicit drug Lilik (Union).
Shock: God For A Day
Issue: Greed
Name: Erro
Features:
- Pious on the surface, but secretly cynical.
- His only honest devotion, other than power, is his handicapped brother.
- Has corrupted his subordinates as well.
- His handicapped brother.
- The belief that God is a self-inflicted lie.
Praxis Scale:
Comformity vs Non-Comformity - 4
Love vs. Hate - 5
=================================================================
Whew, it took me a while to come up with my character, in a way that made sense to me. I hope this habit of being so picky pays off.
As I was thinking about this character, I also began to worry that the Shock is not permeating the Issues directly enough. Or, more accurately, that the real Shock is not actually to be God For A Day, but the belief that Godhood can be attained through technology. Nonetheless, I've decided to leave things as they are, and chalk it off to experience if things don't work out as expected in this first game.
Note: I also used Bruce's suggestion to look at other languages, and derived the names loosely from foreign translations of their issues (Sabotage, Free Will and Greed).
On the next two posts, I hope to flesh out the Antagonists and decide on the Praxis scales.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Mythic GME & Shock: Social Science Fiction: Upcoming Steps
Just as another update, I will also try to get started on character creation today. Each of the players-- Mythic-1, Mythic-2, and me-- will have both a Protagonist and an Antagonist.
After that, I will use this all this info to create the Praxis Scales, which are basically two sets of opposing stats that encompass how everything in this world is done. Right now, based on all the details, I think that one of the scales will be "Harmony vs. Individuality", though I'm also considering "Conservation vs. Change."
After that, I will use this all this info to create the Praxis Scales, which are basically two sets of opposing stats that encompass how everything in this world is done. Right now, based on all the details, I think that one of the scales will be "Harmony vs. Individuality", though I'm also considering "Conservation vs. Change."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)